This is a hot topic for anyone who is or will be attending BYU. The BYU Housing fiasco. My introduction to this topic started a week before school started. I decided to start looking for a house since, after all, it was about time to start school. Sure, I had procrastinated, but I reasoned that there might be a housing glut just as there is in Idaho. To my horror, it turned out that every single one of the two dozen or so complexes I called was full. How could this be?
Before I continue, rest assure I did find an awesome place. No worries.
The situation is this: BYU, as all church schools, provides a list of approved housing. To be on this list, a housing complex must meet certain quality requirements. Additionally, it must ensure that its tenants are enrolled in institute, or something equivalent. In the end, this is good as it places a check on both the land owners to keep their places up, for fear of losing approval; this in turn means loss of tenants, as BYU students, at least, must live in BYU approved housing. Further, it ensures that bad apples are less common.
One of the requirements BYU makes is also that the housing unit must be within a certain distance of the school. E.G., you cannot open a housing complex in Alabama, no matter how much you want, and get it BYU approved. This radius in the past extended into Orem, only a couple miles north, until recently. The radius is now just two miles from campus. This means more people in a smaller area. More demand. Less supply. Economics = very bad.
Then today, while looking for research papers, I broke into a discussion with a few grad students who have had to deal with this issue for some time. Turns out the Provo council has been urged to impose new limits on housing density in certain areas around campus. Instead of unlimited number of tenants per house, it is now limited in some areas to two non-related persons. Note that this would effectively eliminate the appeal of an owner to rent out the house – two tenants are way too few to make renting profitable. But this is exactly the intended response the council hoped for. In addition, the city wants to start a zany new policy that would require everyone to have tags in order to park their cars in certain neighborhoods. Worse, they are trying to push everyone into high density housing in one part of town with the hope that single students will stay out of the rest of town. The most sinister part of this plan is that the high density housing is going to be built without parking. This forces students to simply not have cars – an stated goal of the city council’s plan. Scary.
Worsening this problem, BYU just demolished housing for hundreds if not thousands of students who used to live in the DI towers.
I mention this, not because I want to raise a raucous, but because this is an issue that will affect BYU undergrad students for years to come. The sad part is that the city council can take advantage of the transient nature of students. Even if a student stayed here continuously during his or her undergraduate work, they would be gone in about three or four years – during which time, likely, they would not even care about things a few years down the road. When the time for change did come, students would protest in vain, as the changes would already be well underway. This is a continuity problem. City council members don’t have to cater to the students, because students aren’t there long enough, and are way to busy, to make an issue of petty things like parking or housing zones.
Anywise, just a heads up. If everyone united on this issue, we could probably get the city council to take the appropriate action: cancel their weirdo plan to force the provo area around BYU into an overpriced housing fiasco wherein students can’t own cars. (sounds like a communist micro-city).